---

Forex multi-account manager Z-X-N
Accepts global forex account operation, investment, and trading
Assists family office investment and autonomous management

---

Foreign exchange futures trading is more of a short-term trading activity and is unlikely to be a suitable investment category for long-term investment.

---

From the perspective of exchange rate microstructure research, although spot foreign exchange and foreign exchange futures are both two-way trading instruments, they exhibit significant risk-return asymmetry due to differences in contract systems, warranting investors to give them a full valuation discount when making cross-market allocations.
The periodic rollover mechanism of the futures market essentially introduces an additional time cleavage: when the main contract approaches its delivery month, liquidity suddenly migrates to the following month, forcing existing positions to be closed. If prices then exhibit a one-sided trend, investors face not only the immediate realization of paper profits and losses but also a sharp increase in the threshold for re-establishing positions. The "loss aversion" and "lagging certainty" effects of behavioral finance are amplified at this juncture—losers voluntarily forgo reopening positions due to the high cost of closing mental accounts, while profitable traders reduce their exposure due to increased demands for future volatility premiums. Thus, the term structure shift transforms into a implicit market clearing, with long-term funds being replaced by short-term funds, thereby weakening the price discovery function of futures.
More microscopically, when long positions encounter a trending decline during the rollover window, their risk budgets are often already exhausted, and even a backwardation in the forward curve is unlikely to trigger a signal to go long again. Similarly, if short positions encounter a sustained upward surge during the rollover phase, the sharp increase in margin requirements will also suppress the willingness to reopen positions. Consequently, the depth of both long and short positions in the futures market is eroded simultaneously within the same timeframe, bid-ask elasticity decreases, and an artificial gap appears in the market's self-stabilizing mechanism. While spot forex trading is labeled as "retail sunset industry," its 24-hour continuous matching and lack of fixed settlement dates effectively avoid rollover gaps, allowing risk exposure to roll smoothly over time. This preserves the volatility predictability and capital efficiency required by long-term investors.
As for forward forex, the predicament lies in the inability to generate contracts due to the lack of counterparties. The matching logic of forex futures is essentially a "mirror image of counterparties." When commercial hedging demand is insufficient and speculative positions are concentrated in near-month contracts, the forward pricing chain breaks down. Even if investors want to lock in exchange rate risk beyond one year, they find it difficult to find tradable sell or buy orders on the screen. This liquidity vacuum propagates to the far end of the term structure, ultimately turning "forward forex" into a shadow variable in theoretical pricing formulas rather than a truly tradable asset. Considering the combined factors of institutional friction, behavioral biases, and liquidity stratification, it can be inferred that the "rollover-exit" cycle of foreign exchange futures is accelerating its marginalization. In contrast, although the spot foreign exchange market is shrinking in size, it still retains a marginal advantage in the toolbox of long-tail investors due to its low institutional wear and tear and continuous trading characteristics.

The myth of "high liquidity" in the gold market urgently needs to be demystified.

---

In the two-way trading system of foreign exchange investment, gold is often hailed as the "king of safe havens" and the "most active market in the world," but its actual liquidity structure and transaction costs are far from ideal as they appear. Many investors mistakenly believe that the gold market is so large and actively traded that even orders of dozens of lots can be executed as smoothly as those for mainstream currency pairs, unaware that this perception is significantly flawed. In reality, the average daily trading volume of gold is quite limited. Taking the most active gold futures contract on the CME Group in the US as an example, the average daily trading volume is only around 100,000 lots. If evenly distributed across 24-hour trading hours, the effective liquidity per hour is actually quite thin. Especially during quiet periods such as the Asian morning session, market depth is particularly weak. At this time, placing an order for ten or more lots at once is enough to cause considerable price volatility; if the order size reaches dozens of lots, it can directly trigger price gaps, resulting in significant slippage.
This scarcity of liquidity directly translates into high hidden transaction costs. Calculated by standard lot size, the spread for gold is typically as high as ten to twenty dollars; when the trading volume increases to two or three lots, or even five lots or more, the market's absorption capacity rapidly declines, and slippage begins to appear; if a single order reaches ten lots, the overall transaction cost (including spread and slippage) often soars to thirty or even forty dollars. Even more alarming is that, in extreme cases, if an investor attempts to execute a 30-lot trade at once without significant slippage, the platform may not actually be transmitting the order to the external market, but rather choosing internal hedging, thus creating a direct counterparty relationship with the client. As for large orders of 100 lots, they are virtually impossible to execute in the retail market for spot gold—even if they were to be executed, the final price deviation from the expected quote can easily reach several dollars, and in extreme cases, as much as ten dollars, completely distorting the strategy's predictions.
Therefore, the myth of the "high liquidity" of the gold market urgently needs to be demystified. Its high transaction costs, shallow market depth, and high price sensitivity far exceed the imagination of most retail investors. For traders seeking stable execution, low friction costs, and replicable strategies, gold may not be an ideal target. Without fully understanding its liquidity limitations and cost structure, blindly entering the market is tantamount to building a trading system on quicksand—seemingly solid, but actually a recipe for disaster. Therefore, before deciding whether to participate in gold trading, investors should calmly examine their strategy's reliance on liquidity. If they cannot tolerate high-frequency slippage, high spreads, and potential order execution deviations, a wiser move might be to shift to the more in-depth and transparent mainstream currency pair market, rather than clinging to an overly romanticized "golden illusion."

The credibility and authority of forex industry evaluations are largely lacking in practical reference value.

---

In the two-way trading scenario of forex investment, investors must first understand that the forex industry has gradually become a sunset industry and a niche sector. The decline of the industry ecosystem has caused some forex industry evaluation service providers to deviate from the core principles of fairness and objectivity, prioritizing profit above all else. The credibility and authority of their evaluations have vanished.
From the perspective of the industry's actual ecosystem, these rating providers often operate in the middle of a profit chain. On the one hand, they lure and exploit small and medium-sized retail investors lacking professional knowledge through false ratings; on the other hand, they pressure smaller forex brokers with unreasonable rating standards, extracting illicit profits. This cutthroat competition further exacerbates the chaos in the industry, making it increasingly difficult for the forex industry to rebuild a fair system and restore its reputation.
It is particularly important to remind forex novice investors and those lacking in-depth understanding of trading platforms to be wary of information asymmetry. Negative reviews of some platforms are often deliberately hidden and difficult for outsiders to detect. Furthermore, various so-called platform ratings on the market, lacking unified and objective evaluation dimensions and regulatory constraints, are mostly of no practical value. Do not use such ratings as the core basis for choosing a trading platform.

In the practice of two-way trading in forex investment, high-frequency trading is often not a sign of skill proficiency, but rather a typical characteristic of traders still in the early stages.

---

Many novice investors, driven by the illusion of "the more you trade, the more you earn," frequently enter and exit the market ten, twenty, thirty, forty, or even a hundred times a day, acting entirely on momentary emotions or vague intuition. They lack both clear trading logic and a basic understanding of market structure. Their judgments of tops and bottoms often rely on subjective conjecture rather than objective evidence; each order is like the blind men and the elephant, lacking rules, systematic guidance, and any form of risk control. This trading style, which substitutes "feel" for strategy and uses "frequency" to mask ignorance, is essentially a high-cost self-destructive practice, easily depleting capital rapidly during market fluctuations and ultimately leading to account blowout.
In contrast, mature traders deeply understand the philosophy of "less is more." They may observe quietly for several days, not making hasty moves; even when focusing on short-term trading, they execute only one to two or three trades a day. Behind every trade lies a rigorous system – from identifying key support and resistance levels, to comprehensively analyzing market sentiment and the balance of power between buyers and sellers, to the precise coordination of entry timing and position management, all reflecting discipline and consistency. The rest of the time, they are willing to wait, preferring to miss opportunities rather than take risks. Occasionally, they might try a trade, but this is strictly limited to a very small position, merely to get a feel for the market, and never to compromise the overall risk management framework. This restraint and patience does not stem from a lack of opportunities, but from a profound understanding of the market's nature: true trading opportunities are scarce and precious, not readily available every day.
It should be understood that the forex market never promises actionable opportunities every day, let alone a constant stream of "plenty of opportunities." Blindly pursuing high trading frequency is essentially treating the market like a casino; using high-frequency hedging with insufficient understanding will ultimately lead to heavy losses. Especially for highly volatile instruments—such as gold and Bitcoin—even if the directional judgment is correct, a slight deviation in entry point, coupled with high leverage and wide price swings, can trigger forced liquidation. Therefore, the wise course of action is to proactively avoid such highly volatile instruments, especially when one's system is not yet mature and risk management capabilities are weak. The true path to trading advancement lies not in how fast your hands are, but in how calm your mind is; not in how many trades you make, but in whether each trade withstands the dual test of logic and time.

In the forex market, high-frequency trading is a deadly trap for traders.

---

The core problem lies in the imbalance of "small profits and large losses," and these large losses are often devastating, enough to wipe out all previous profits and even erode the principal, becoming a key reason why most traders fail.
Leverage, as a core tool in forex trading, is indispensable but harbors extremely high risks. In the current market, many platforms, individuals, and self-media outlets are keen to highlight the profit potential of leveraged trading while avoiding any discussion of its potential risks. However, in actual trading scenarios, the risk amplification effect of leverage is extremely significant. Once the market trend is misjudged, losses can escalate exponentially. Taking gold trading as an example, misjudging price trends can lead to substantial losses at best, and in severe cases, complete account liquidation, leaving traders instantly in a passive position.
From long-term market experience, gold trading, due to its short profit cycle and attractive returns, has always been a popular category in the forex market. However, it is also accompanied by extremely high operational difficulty and uncertainty. Many traders, while able to achieve short-term gains in gold trading, are highly susceptible to fatal losses. The root cause often lies in cognitive biases resulting from misjudgments of the trend—most investors are unwilling to face the fact that their judgment was flawed, clinging to a gambler's mentality and allowing losses to escalate, ultimately leading to an irrecoverable situation.
It is worth noting that experienced forex traders, in their long-term practice, often choose to focus on in-depth research on a single currency pair, with major currency pairs such as the Euro/US Dollar being typical examples. These currency pairs exhibit relatively stable operating patterns, clear operational logic, and moderate price fluctuations. This not only reduces the difficulty of trend prediction but also makes it easier for traders to grasp the core rhythm of "buying low and selling high." Furthermore, it allows for timely setting and execution of stop-loss strategies, effectively mitigating the extreme loss risks that may occur in gold trading, thus achieving a more stable trading cycle.
However, misleading information in the market is also a significant threat to traders, especially beginners. Various trading signal groups and comment sections generally exhibit a one-sided orientation of "reporting only good news and concealing bad news." Some entities distort the truth of trading through wordplay, confusing beginners. Even worse, some platforms openly use highly tempting terms like "easy money" to mislead investors, fabricating false gimmicks of "expert guidance," deliberately exaggerating the past profits of so-called "experts" by hundreds or thousands of times in their promotional materials, creating a false impression of a booming trading market. However, in actual trading, these promotional contents are often severely disconnected from actual returns. The so-called "profitable trading" is nothing more than a scam to exploit investors, seriously harming the legitimate rights and interests of traders.

---

• 
• 

---

13711580480@139.com

+86 137 1158 0480

+86 137 1158 0480

+86 137 1158 0480

z.x.n@139.com

Mr. Z-X-N

China · Guangzhou

---